Twitter Facebook LinekdIn Instagram
Twitter Facebook LinekdIn Instagram


Wind power in Finland

Environmental impacts of wind power

Positive environmental impacts

Wind power requires no fuel and does not pollute the air, water or soil. Carbon dioxide emissions for wind power are approximately 10 g/kWh, emitted principally during construction, assembly, transportation and maintenance [1].

The main positive environmental impact of wind energy is the reduction in overall energy system carbon and particle emissions. The size of this reduction depends on which other forms of energy generation are replaced by wind power. If wind power replaced coal fired power stations, the reduction in carbon emissions would be of the order of 800-900 gCO2/kWh. This is roughly the same reducing effect of wind power on greenhouse gas emissions as seen in Denmark, where there is a lot of coal-fired electricity production.

In Finland the majority of consumed electricity is produced using natural gas, hydroelectric and nuclear power, all of which produce less greenhouse gas emissions than coal-fired power stations. When wind power produces 10% of total Nordic electricity consumption, very little nuclear or hydroelectric production will have been replaced. Given the structure of electricity generation in Finland, the initial effects of wind power on greenhouse gas emissions would be in the region of 700 gCO2/kWh. Once wind power accounts for over 10% of consumed electricity, the reducing effect on emissions would be 600 gCO2/kWh. When coal and natural gas fired power stations are completely replaced by wind power, the overall reducing effect on electricity generation emissions will be 300 gCO2/kWh [2,3].

Negative environmental impacts

As with all forms of energy production, wind power also has some negative environmental impacts. These environmental impacts can be divided into those caused during construction, during operation and during decommissioning. The nature of the environmental impacts and in particular their severity is dependent on a number of factors, such as the size and method of implementation, the conditions on the site and competing land use. When wind power is constructed in an existing industrial setting, the environmental impacts (not including visual impacts) are indistinguishable from those of the existing industrial activities. However, if wind power is to be installed in sensitive natural areas (e.g. mountain crests or outer archipelago), a detailed environmental impact assessment is required. It is recommended that wind power is not built in the most sensitive areas.

Appropriate siting of wind turbines can have a significant effect on reducing negative environmental impacts. The criteria used by the Finnish Association for Nature Conservation to award the EKOenergy ecolabel for electricity are a good place to start. The EKOenergy label informs consumers about which energy production methods are best for the environment and it can be awarded to electricity produced by wind power, bioenergy, existing hydroelectric and solar power, as well as to energy efficiency services. Wind power can be awarded the EcoEnergy mark on the condition that turbines are not sited in nature protection areas, nationally or regionally important sites of landscape interest or heritage, or internationally or nationally important bird areas [4].

1. Arvensen A, et al, 2009. Extended life-cycle assessment for offshore wind power. Seminar presentation, European offshore wind conference, 15.9.2009.
2. Soimakallio, S, Savolainen I. (eds.), Technology and Climate Change CLIMTECH 1999-2002, Technology
Programme Report 14/2002 Final Report, TEKES, Helsinki 2002
3. Holttinen, H, Tuhkanen, S, 2004. The effect of wind power on CO2 abatement in the Nordic Countries, Energy Policy Vol 32/14 pp 1639-1652.
4. Finnish Association for Nature Conservation.